Luke 16: 19-31
Offered by Elder Mel Prestamo PCUSA to the congregation of the Wharton United Community Congregation
Today’s lectionary begins with another of Jesus’ many parables which in one way or another deal with affluence and wealth.
This series of parables begins in Luke 12 with a person calling out to Jesus from the crowd that was following him – to order his brother to share the inheritance from their father’s estate. Jesus doesn’t give the man the answers he is demanding but rather answers him by telling the people the parable of the rich fool who built barns in which he could store up his surplus wealth. In that parable, on the day he completes his buildings God calls him to his death. The rich man is called a fool for having wasted his life storing up wealth in this world but not storing up riches in the next.
Next, we see Jesus as a guest at a wedding feast. There he observes how the people arriving at the celebration – jockey for position to be seated at places of honor closest to the host. He teaches the parable of the wedding guest who enters a banquet and immediately sits at a place of high honor only to be delegated to a lower seat when the host sees a more important guest arrive. The host goes to the first guest and tells him to give up his place to the newly arriving guest. The first guest is now disgraced at being demoted and removed from a place of honor at the table to be relegated to one farther away from the host. Here, Jesus admonishes the people at the feast for allowing their haughty egos to get the better of themselves. They arrive expecting that they should be honored to the high level in which they view themselves.
In Luke 15, we have the parable of the Prodigal Father. Here we have a young man who is situated in the lap of luxury living within the wealth and comfort of his father’s house. Desiring more – what – wealth, prominence, a higher degree of importance in life, whatever it was – he desired more. He makes a decision to leave the father’s household taking with him as much of his inheritance as he can amass and then goes off to squander it making poor life decisions that eventually separate him from the love of God and father.
In a twist, this young man repents and returns to his father desiring to be forgiven. And in Jesus’ story the young man is received back into the father’s household and is lavishly showered with gifts from the father in the form of rings, and robes, and sandals. A happy ending? Not yet. Jesus introduces us to the older brother who is now called upon to share in the father’s celebration and greet his wayward brother back into the joy of the father’s household. He refuses. He chooses not to share the inheritance that he was blessed with. He chooses rather to keep his brother at arm’s length, apart from the graces and forgiving love of the father. This is another example of a lesson when Jesus uses characters who refuse to share the earthly wealth that they have been blessed with.
Next in Luke 16, we have the story of the steward who is a scoundrel and a rascal and who defrauds his master by embezzling from the business dealings which he had been entrusted. Jesus weaves this story to show to his disciples just how devious and evil people can become when dealing with great wealth. Now part of Jesus’ message here is to say to his disciples that he would like them to work as hard at procuring wealth in the kingdom of heaven as these rascals are at achieving earthly wealth. Ultimately in Luke’s text he remarks that the Pharisees, who were lovers of money were ridiculed and embarrassed by Jesus telling this parable. Again, Jesus takes his followers to task warning them not to place a love of earthly things above building a righteous relationship with God. In all of these stories, Jesus is admonishing his followers to keep God first.
Now, we come upon today’s lectionary, and it is a famous one. It is the parable of Lazarus and the rich man who always dressed in purple and fine linen and who feasted sumptuously every day.
Before we go any further, it is important to understand what these descriptive words of Jesus meant in the culture of his day. First, only royalty dressed in purple robes. This rich man is not described as being a prince or a king so to find him dressed in purple robes and fine linen raises an eyebrow that perhaps he was purposefully flaunting his wealth so as to impress.
He feasted sumptuously every day. This is another highly unusual way to describe a Palestinian since regular folk didn’t engage in feasting every day– not even the rich did that. People in Palestine only feasted at important galas or events like weddings. Eating sumptuously – again was something that didn’t happen every day. Preparing fatted calves and eating meats were reserved for special occasions – not every day. But as we note in this parable, this rich man did this every day. In the culture of the day, this would have been considered an abhorrent display of gross self-indulgence. But that is how Jesus describes the rich man.
As an aside, I might suggest to you that Jesus may have been making reference to King Herod. Who was not a legitimate king of Israel but rather a Roman appointee. And as we have seen in the other Gospels, Herod was prone to lavishly outlandish parties and celebrations. But that would be a message for another time. Let’s return to Jesus’ parable of the rich man and Lazarus.
Now we have this poor man, Lazarus. First note, Lazarus is the ONLY person ever named in any of Jesus’ parables. We’ll have more on that later.
Lazarus is pictured as living at the entrance of the rich man’s gate. What do we know about Lazarus? He is covered with sores. Dogs licking his wounds are his only comfort. He looked to satisfy his hunger with scraps that fell from the rich man’s table. But he was not even given that. It doesn’t seem that even the rich man’s scraps were shared.
And now here’s another item to be aware of. By Jewish law, the rich were not supposed to consume all of their resources. For instance, at harvest time, they were obliged to leave a portion – 10% – of the harvest behind to allow the poor to come after the workers and glean from the harvest something that they could subsist on. You remember the Old Testament story of Ruth gleaning wheat from the fields after Obed’s workers had completed their work at the harvest.
But the rich man in Jesus’ story consumed everything and what may have been scraps left over from his sumptuous feasts were not shared. Now, understand the people hearing this story would not have been in any way sympathetic to the rich man. He is by all telling an obnoxious blob that consumed everything around him.
Something to consider here. First, the poor man Lazarus lived at the rich man’s doorstep. Coming and going, the rich man would have to step over this poor man. There was no way that the rich man could not have known about his plight. So it wasn’t that this man’s poverty was far off, unseen and that the rich man was unaware of its existence. No. It lived on his doorstep, and he ignored it. This, to the listening ears of the people would have been as I said before – abhorrent – a total breakdown of Jewish law.
So now, what happens? The poor man, Lazarus, dies and is carried away by angels to be with Abraham. The rich man also dies. But he is buried. Notice the difference between the two. The rich man is buried in the ground – his body to rot away back into dust. Lazarus, on the other hand, is carried up by angels to be with Abraham. The only other Biblical character that is treated in this manner was the prophet, Elijah.
Back to the story. In Hades, [Hell] the rich man is tormented with thirst by the fires of hell. He looks up and sees Abraham far off across a chasm with Lazarus standing by his side – presumably enjoying the comforts of the afterlife.
The rich man calls out for mercy. Send Lazarus to dip a finger into cool water and touch his tongue to relieve his thirst. Abraham responds, “No can do, brother.” There’s this chasm between us so that none can cross over. Besides, you enjoyed your luxury in your former life now its Lazarus’ turn.
Another thought – there is a chasm between us, Abraham says. This is more than a description of what separates Hades from the heavenly Kingdom of God. It also describes how the rich man lived his life of luxury totally separated and apart from the needs of the poor and this poor man that he crossed over without giving him a moment’s thought in his former life.
Then the rich man asks that Abraham send Lazarus to warn his brothers so that they won’t suffer the same fate. Abraham replies in the negative, again. “They have Moses and the prophets. They should listen to them.” But wait. The rich man says, “If someone goes to them from the dead, they will listen and repent.” Yeah – No, Abraham answers again. “If they do not listen to Moses and the prophets neither will they be convinced it someone rises from the dead.”
Woo! There’s a lot going on here. First, consider this. There has already been a Lazarus raised from the dead. We get the accounts of it in the Gospel of John not Luke, but the timeline is very close to the same – at the close of Jesus’ ministry on the road to Jerusalem. Jesus is called to the home of Mary and Martha because their brother Lazarus is dying. When Jesus arrive, Lazarus is already dead. Jesus calls Lazarus and raises him from the dead. But do the Pharisees and Elders of the people believe in Jesus as the Christ, as the Messiah. No. They don’t believe even when someone is raised from the dead. In fact the opposite is true. They immediately plot to murder both Jesus and Lazarus.
Not only that, but Jesus is also referring to his own resurrection and that the Jewish elite – Herod and his ilk and those leaders collaborating with the Romans – will not believe in his truthful message either even though he validates it with his rising from the dead.
But at the heart of the parable that Jesus is teaching is that the rich have ignored their responsibility to the rest of society – to those less fortunate, to the poor. The King [Herod] who lived to enjoy lavish feasts, the Pharisees, the Scribes who took advantage of the weak by using the law against them – who Jesus had accused of feeding on widows and children – these were all the prominent and wealthy people of Palestine who had lost their connection with the people and with God. They were building up their own barns to store up their earthy wealth forgetting and ignoring their need to build up their treasures in heaven.
There was a Rabbinical teaching at the time. It was, “The rich help the poor in this life and the poor help the rich in the next life.” The rich, Jesus was saying, had forgotten what the blessings that God had bestowed upon them were to be used for.
The religious leaders of the people had stopped building up their store houses for the next life. They were concerned with how to survive and take advantage of their rank, position and privilege so that they could prosper in this life. They had forgotten the One who had blessed them with their positions of authority and were abusing the trust of the people and not responding to God’s expectation that they be good stewards of God’s Garden – of God’s creation.
They were not being good stewards of the Creation entrusted to them by God and they were ignoring their responsibilities by abusing the weak and broken people who God desired they care for.
So, what does this lectionary passage teach us – or more importantly, ask of us?
First, I think, it is that the needy are not far from our sight but very close to our front door. We are not to ignore them, stepping over them and creating a chasm between them and us holding them off at a distance. This would be a break down of our role as good stewards of God’s Garden.
Next, the people were told you have Moses and the prophets, and they should heed their messages. But more importantly for us, we have the Christ Jesus. If the lessons of the Old Scriptures are not clear enough for us, Jesus is wielding a blunt hammer, and his message is clear. What we have been given in this life is a gift from God. We are to be good stewards of it and make those gifts grow by nurturing and caring for them. However, we are not to forget that the source of those gifts is the Holy One and all of it [and us] belongs to God, exclusively. We cannot hide it away, hoarding it up in barns for ourselves. It must be shared with those who are the least among us. Remember, when we do it for the least of these, we are doing it for him.