• Based upon Luke 6: 27-38

    Offered to the congregation of the Community Church of Chester, NJ on February 20, 2022

    Mel Prestamo, Ruling Elder PCUSA

    This morning, the lectionary takes us to one of the most notable of Jesus’ teachings. We have here what is referred to as the “Golden Rule”. It may be the most quoted phrase in the Gospels next to John 3:16. But my questions for us today are, what was so special about the Golden Rule and how should it impact us? How are we supposed to respond to this teaching? What’s so golden about the Golden Rule?

    Throughout the theological and philosophical history of mankind, there have been many theologians and philosophers who have taught something like Jesus’ Golden Rule. Here, let me read a couple of them for you and see if you can pick out the difference.

    Hillel was a great Jewish Rabbi several generations before the time of Jesus. He was once asked to teach the whole of Jewish law while standing on one leg. I don’t know if this was an endurance challenge to prove the breath of his knowledge of the law or simply a request to simplify the whole of Jewish law. You know after the 10 Commandments that God gave to Moses, Jewish teachers created over 600 mitzvahs detailing how those commandments impacted daily life. Hillel responded, “What is hateful to thee, do not do to another.” This is similar to Jesus’ Golden Rule but not quite the same. If I can paraphrase what Hillel was saying it might be, “If you don’t like being on the receiving end, don’t be the giver.”

    Philo, was another great Jewish thinker in the city of Alexandria. He said, “What you hate to suffer, do not do to anyone else.” Sounds the same. Isocrates, a Greek orator, said, “What things make you angry when you suffer them at the hands of others, do not do to other people.” The Stoics taught, “What you do not wish to be done to yourself, do not do to any other.” These all are pretty much the same.

    Confucius, the great Chinese philosopher was once asked, “Is there one word which may serve as a rule of life?” He responded, “Is it not “reciprocity”? What you do not want done to yourself, do not do to others.”

    All of these teachings from Teachers, theologians and philosophers all have a similar ring to them. And today, people [even Christians] use some form of these sayings as if they were different versions of Jesus’ Golden Rule. But they’re not.

    All of these teachings and how we use them today, are all on the flip side of what Jesus is teaching. All of these are negative versions of Jesus’ Golden Rule.

    What Hillel, Philo and Isocrates said was, if you don’t like something to be done to you, don’t do it to another. In other words, if you don’t like being spat upon, don’t spit. If you don’t like being cheated, don’t cheat. If you don’t like being lied about, don’t lie. All of these are based on the negative premise of what we don’t want to happen to us. I don’t want to be spat upon, lied about or cheated. So, if you don’t spit, lie or cheat me, I won’t spit, lie or cheat you. These teachings don’t really express a care or concern for the wellbeing of the other, your neighbor.  In each case, our own well-being is the central focus of these teachings.

    Confucius’ statement is a bit more curious, though. He answered by using the word “reciprocity”. “What you do not want done to you, do not do to others.” But reciprocity, also allows for further response, doesn’t it? It allows you to say, if you hurt me, then I hurt you. Tit for Tat. That word reciprocity leaves that door open for a whole host of nasty things to follow. And isn’t that apparent in all of these philosophies and teachings. The door is always open for reciprocity. They create cycles in which pain and anger continually come around.

    Now here’s a side bar thought I’m going to slip into our conversation. You can think about it as we go forward. God’s ultimate aim for creation is to bring it all back into Shalom with God. That is, that God’s Peace should once again reign throughout all creation; not the chaos we experience now; not the sinned filled world we have created. If we follow these negative theses for living with one another and have them be the basis for how humanity gets along, then how does any of it promote God’s Shalom in creation. Tit for Tat is NOT a basis for building Shalom.

    So, all of these teachings may appear worthy; they may appeal to us and make some kind of sense; or seem to express some element of fairness; but they all fall woefully short of what Jesus is asking of us.

    I said before that these teachings are negative in their postulation and premise. Jesus, however, proposes a positive postulation. Jesus doesn’t say use your neighbor’s actions as a measure for how you should act. All of these prior teachings use as a rule, what you do not like done to you. But Jesus teaches that we should be the first to act. We should act with kindness and love, regardless of how your neighbor acts towards us. Love your neighbor as yourself, first.

    Now listen, I don’t want you to think that the bar that Jesus is setting is so unreasonably high that it just isn’t possible for us to accomplish. I don’t want you to say, “You know what. It’s a nice thought but, really? Let’s just skip over this passage and jump over to John 3:16. You know that part where it says God gives up God’s Son for our salvation. This love your neighbor thing is not something I can do. I just can’t love that jerk next door. You don’t know him. If you did, you would understand why I can’t love him. He’s an idiot!.”

    Hey, we’ve all been there. Yeah. So, let’s break this teaching down into something we can do.

    Our reading from Luke today begins, Jesus says, “to anyone who listens”, “Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you and pray for those who ill-use you.” This is a phrase that we shutter the most at. How can we do that? How can we love the terrorist, love the murderer, love the racist, or love the enemy threatening to launch nuclear missiles at us and any others that would do us harm? Don’t we have to be on our guard? Don’t we have to build fences to protect ourselves? After all, good fences, make good neighbors. How can we love them when they are out to destroy us? All of these arguments are swirling around us every day, and they distract us from what we are being called to be.

    So, how do we as American Christians living in a hostile world, love all of these enemies?

    Well first, let’s understand what the word for “love” is that Jesus was using and what it is he is asking us to do.

    There are three words for our word love in the Greek language. There is “eran” which describes a passionate love that is the strong, emotional and heated love between two people for each other. That is not the word that Jesus uses here. So, Jesus is not asking us to go and kiss our enemies on the lips.

    The second Greek word for love is, “philein” [phil-lain]. This is a word for love that describes our feelings for our nearest and dearest family and friends. It is an affectionate feeling of the heart. But again, this is not the word for love that Jesus uses here. So, He is not asking us to care for our enemies as we would our children, family members or our best friend.

    The word that Jesus uses is “agapan”. Agapan means a feeling of benevolence towards other people. It means that no matter what others do to us, we will never allow ourselves to desire anything for them but their highest good and that we will deliberately, with a “purpose of mind” set out to do only good to them and to be kind to them. That’s a mouth full. I’ve just used fifty words to define one Greek word. So let me boil it down so that we can focus on one key phrase, that is, “with a purpose of mind.”

    We cannot love our enemies as we do our partners. We cannot love our enemies as we do our children, or as we do our closest friends here in this congregation. That would be exceedingly difficult, superhuman in fact. These are forms of love that are spontaneous, that come deep from within our being and sometimes cannot be understood or controlled. We cannot conger up an erotic or familial love for our enemies. And that is not what Jesus is asking us to do. That is not the love that Jesus is using here.

    The love that Jesus is calling us to is not something of the heart. It is of the will, of the mind. It is something that [only by the grace of Jesus] we can “will” ourselves to do. This is what separates Jesus’ teachings from the former negative ones that preceded him. It is not unduly difficult to keep ourselves from harming our neighbors if they do not harm us. But it is very different to go out of our way to do a good to others. This is the essence of the Christian ethic. It is based upon doing the extra thing. Walking the extra mile, giving up your tunic when a cloak is asked for, turning the other cheek. It consists, not of refraining from doing bad things, but actively doing good things.

    In this passage this morning, Jesus asks, “If you love those who love you, what special grace is there in that? Even sinners do that.” Your enemies love those who love them. “If you are kind to people who are kind to you, what is special about that? Even sinners do that.”

    That is what falls short with all the previous negatively based teachings. They are all based upon what others do. But Jesus says that if you follow me, if you are listening, you must do more. You must go further. You have to make a concerted effort of the mind to love your neighbor and Jesus tells us, that God will provide the grace to help us to do that. He knows we can’t do it on our own. And yes, that is a fair response to Jesus’ commandment to us to Love our neighbor. We CAN’T do it on our own. We can’t love the jerk next door on our own. You can’t. I can’t. We will need help. And where does that help come from. It comes from Jesus, our ROCK, our source of strength. Jesus tells us that help will always be available. We can access it through prayer. It is there in the Spirit that Jesus sent to guide and walk beside us.

    But why? Why has Jesus set this high standard apart from any teaching that mankind had developed on its own previous to Jesus? Well, Jesus tells us, “Your reward will be great and you will be the sons of the Most High.” Now that is nice, and it would be nice to cut the line off right there and end it with a period. Right? We get a reward. That’s why we do it, right? Good enough, let’s go home.

    But Jesus is not finished, he continues… “BECAUSE He [that HE is the Father, it is God] is kind to both the thankless and the wicked. Wait! What? Yes. Hear Jesus’ words again, “God is kind to both the thankless and the wicked.” Jesus continues, “Be merciful AS YOUR FATHER IN HEAVEN is merciful; do NOT judge and you will not be judged; do NOT condemn and you will not be condemned; FORGIVE and you will be forgiven.” Jesus tells us to do these things because our Father in heaven does them and because doing them will make us more like the Father.

    And that is the bottom line for Jesus isn’t it? Don’t you see that? Jesus calls us in all ways to know who the Father is and to be more like that Father. The Father is kind. Be kind. The Father is merciful. Be merciful. Do not judge or condemn but be forgiving for the Father is forgiving. Doing these things brings us closer to the Father. Now Jesus knows that we cannot love our neighbors as we do our partners. Jesus knows we can’t even love them with the love we have for our children and friends. But with God’s grace, Jesus is asking us to “set our minds to the task”, to make the decision to do good for all of those who are against us. That is Agape love. That is a love that we can and must decide to have for others.

    CHARGE:

    So, my charge to you this week is a simple one. It is to go out and love the jerk next door. Yes. You will need help. So, I say to you again, go to Jesus in prayer and ask for that help.

    BENEDICITON:

    May the God of mercy and forgiveness make his face to shine upon you and give you Peace.

  • Based upon readings from Isaiah 6 and Luke 5

    Offered to the First Presbyterian Church of Long Valley, NJ – February 6, 2022

    Mel Prestamo, Ruling Elder PCUSA

    “Here I am.”  Out of curiosity, I googled the phrase. It has been used as a popular song title by artists such as Bryan Adams and Air Supply. It’s even the title of a gangster rap song by Rick Ross. Dolly Parton uses the phrase for the title of a documentary on her life’s journey. As romantic love songs, it seems to be used as a lament to tell the world, Here I am, broken hearted. Rick Ross uses it to announce to the world, Hey!, Here I am!. I’ve arrived. Dolly Parton wants it to reflect on her life experiences and how they had brought her to where she is today as a performer, activist, feminist and Christian. Each one uses the phrase in one way or another to announce that they are here.

    It’s a Hymn in our own faith tradition and we often use it during confirmation and ordination ceremonies as a pronouncement of our faith saying “Here I am, Lord. I’m ready to serve.”

    These are very recognizable words from our Bible tradition. I did a little investigation and found that the phrase, “Here I am” appears over 800 times in the Old Testament. It is Joseph’s response when his father Jacob calls him to check on his other sons and his flock. Jacob calls Joseph. Joseph responds, “Here I am” and Jacob sends Joseph out to check on his brothers and as you may recall that begins for Joseph a most tumultuous life’s journey. Most notably, we recognize it as Isaiah’s response to God’s call when Isaiah experiences a vision that has him at the throne of the Most High.

    The two readings selected for today’s lectionary focus very clearly upon the action of being called and the responses of Isaiah and Peter.

    Being called, what does that mean? It would be an understatement to suggest that being called is different for each of us. A call to ministry such as the one that Pastor has answered is different from how one responds to leading our music ministry or to leading our Youth ministry. A Deacon’s call is different from a Ruling Elder’s call. Our Bible study leaders have responded to calls by bringing their strengths to this congregation. Our Building Care Elders tend to the physical plant of the church making sure that we have a well-maintained structure to worship within and bring our ministries to the community. And let’s not forget how we use the buildings. We house the Food Pantry which brings food to the needy in the Long Valley community. We allow community groups to use our facilities for their activities. All of these ministers have responded in different ways to answer calls to ministry.

    It is as Paul suggests. We all have different strengths to exploit and employing them all is what builds up the body of the church. Many have heard God’s call; and many have stepped forward to find some way within this church community to be a part of the work of the Body.

    Hearing or experiencing a “Call” can be different for each of us. Take Isaiah. He sees a vision. And in that vision, he sees the God Most High sitting on a throne. God is attended by Seraphs, and they are calling out praises to the God Most High. Their voices are so powerful that their sound shakes the foundations of the throne room. Isaiah feels and sees all this and falls prostrate and cries out, “Woe is me for I am a man of unclear lips.” In other words, I am not worthy. I am not clean; I am a lowly human from a people who are unclean. He must be thinking to himself, “What am I doing here?” Isaiah might be suggesting, if anyone is unworthy of being brought into the presence of the Lord, it is me! Does that describe you? Most times, I think it describes me.

    Yet, yet, that does not seem to bother God. God does not look down on the lowly [we sinners] and grunt at our lack of worthiness. God sees within each of us a talent, an ability to contribute to God’s plan of bringing all of creation back into Shalom, back into God’s peace. One of the Seraphs comes down to Isaiah, who is lying face down on the ground, and puts a coal to his lips to purify him, to make him worthy. This is an act clearly initiated by the God Most High. For it is only God’s grace and mercy that can purify us of our sins.

    What is the significance of this? It can be suggested this is no mere coal. It is a symbolic representation of the Messiah Yeshua [Yes-shu-a -that is Jesus]. It is symbolic in that it displays how something very low [a mere piece of coal] is raised to the heights of being able to forgive and wash away the stain of sin. That is a foreshadowing of the ultimate work of the Christ. So, here in Isaiah, we have both a Messianic prophecy [the forgiveness of sins] AND an example of how one should respond to that forgiveness and that cleansing. After receiving God’s mercy, when God calls and asks, “Whom shall I send?”, Isaiah responds, “Here I am. Send me.” He had gone from feeling woeful to being boldly and fully filled with grace.

    Now what happens when God calls us? I am not going to suggest to you that there might be a dramatic earth-shaking event such as Isaiah had experienced before the throne as a sign that we are being called. That would be too easy for us, wouldn’t it? I mean it would make it too easy for us to refuse a call because it isn’t bombastic enough. Instead of committing when asked to serve, we can respond by saying, “Well, the earth didn’t move”. I mean, picture our Gifts & Talents Elder coming to you and asking if you could serve as a member of some work group within the ministry of the church. And you put out your hands to steady yourself, and look around, then when nothing happens you respond, “No, I think I should wait.” That would make it too easy to say, “No.”

    No, it might be something simpler like Jesus suggesting to Peter, “Hey, that spot looks good. Go fish over there.” That is when we experience something, feel something, and a bell of recognition goes off in our head and we realize that in a very quiet way that small, faint voice of God has called.

    In the Gospel passage from Luke this morning, many people refer to the amazing catch of fish by Peter as a miracle. I read in a commentary that there are three conditions for a miracle. The first is that the eye needs to see. What I mean by that is that we have to take the time to see what is happening around us. We need to see the need, the hurt, the places where God is pointing us to. Take for example, Jesus’ suggestion to Peter that he fish over in some spot that Jesus was pointing to. Now, we can think that Jesus miraculously created a shoal of fish in that spot and directed Peter to fish in it. But I think that would be missing the miracle. The miracle, I think, was in Peter’s response.

    The truth is Lake Gennesaret was teeming with fish. It is acknowledged that from the shoreline, you could literally see shadowed areas so densely filled with fish that they would be jumping into your boat. All Jesus needed to be was observant. Jesus observed that the conditions were right for an abundant catch. An exhausted Peter couldn’t see that. He thought it was hopeless. The night was a total loss. Fishing in the morning would be hopeless. But Jesus had an eye for possibilities.

    So now step two. There needs to be a spirit willing to make an effort. Peter was exhausted. This was early morning. He had been fishing all night and now they were cleaning their nets which signified the end of their workday. What was next was a meal and sleep. But Jesus, this teacher that was surrounded by hundreds of people on the shore was telling him to go out again and fish over there in that spot. If Peter wasn’t willing. If Peter gave into his exhaustion. If Peter said, “You know what Mr. Preacher Man, I work long hours and I don’t have time to go chasing your fantasies.” If Peter responded in that way, there would have been no miracle.

    But no. Peter responds with a spirit that is willing to attempt what seems hopeless. That is step three. Many times, that is what church work, what servant work, is like. We could have looked at the need for food in our community years back and said, “You know what. There are too many people who need assistance. We can’t possibly provide for all of them. It bigger than us. It’s a job for one of those bigger catholic churches. They have more people. Their better equipped.” If LVPC had that attitude years ago, we would have never had built the coalition of congregations known as LVCAP that now provides food security for more than 100 families locally. There was a spirit willing to attempt the hopeless.

    About a decade ago, LVPC decided to start a ministry to the Dominican Republic. We partnered with the Foundation for Peace. It started small. We were helping a struggling congregation to build a place of worship. That was their hopeless dream. We were pointed to a spot and told to build there. The work was slow and tedious. It was all back breaking, manual labor. They started by digging a foundation, and then the next year laying concrete block, then in the next years building walls and then a floor and a ceiling until after many, many years, they had built a church, a place of Worship in a spot where was nothing before. When that was finished, they began a second building. The first was already being used as a community center providing needed health support and services to the community and the new building was to become the new sanctuary. That was when I finally dragged my sorry butt down to participate. It was an unbelievable experience. The timing wasn’t perfect. I had to take time off from work as did many others in our group. But we were there when we finished building a church. We poured the floor and ceiling with concrete bucket by bucket. I can remember passing buckets to others in a bucket line. We did that for hours over several days. Ultimately, when the work was completed, we were able to participate in the first worship service in that new house of God. What seemed hopeless more than a decade before had become community and worship centers. Can I get an Amen?

    The circumstances were not perfect for Peter. Peter wasn’t coming off of a good night’s sleep. It was the opposite. He was exhausted because he was working all night. He was dead tired, but Peter had a spirit that was alive. Was something stirred in him by the words Jesus was teaching from his boat? We don’t know. Luke doesn’t tell us what Jesus was teaching that day. But whatever it was; whatever was said, it stirred in Peter a spirit of willingness and a spirit to act. Peter responded to what might have been hopeless with a willingness to act.

    Now this speaks to us today about when, how, and why we respond or do not respond to a call. Sometimes, we wait for the perfect set of circumstances. Sometimes we expect that call for us should be like it was for Isaiah. That the earth should shutter. That there should be visions of Angles swirling around overhead. That the circumstances would be that we are finally rested, that we are finally financially secured, that we are available because the kids have moved on and setting up households of their own. Sometimes we are thinking, I should wait for the circumstances to be perfect. But you know what, the circumstances will never be perfect. We will never be rested enough. We will never be financially secure enough. We will always find a reason that our kids will need our help. If we wait for the perfect time, if we wait for an Isaiah moment then nothing will happen. We would have missed the opportunity to see with our eyes the hopeless situation that Jesus is calling us to. We would be burying within us that spirit that burns to be fired up and set free. We need to make the effort to see and do the impossible. We must take Jesus at his word when he bids us to attempt the impossible. We need to be faithful to the possible in hopeless impossibilities. When we hear that wee small voice of God ask, “Whom shall I send?” We need to respond, “Here I am Lord, Send me!”

    Charge: My friends, listen for the wee, small voice of God calling you. It may sound like another church member asking for help on a project. But remember that our God is awesome. One of the awesome things God can be is a ventriloquist. God can sound like so many different voices. So, if you listen and hear one of God’s voices, step out and say, Here I am!

  • Based upon Mark 3: 1-6

    Second Sunday of Advent, December 7, 2025

    Offered by Mel Prestamo, Ruling Elder PCUSA to the congregation of the Presbyterian Church at Bound Brook, NJ

    So, I will begin today by asking you the same question that Jesus asked the religious leaders of the synagogue. “Is it lawful to do good on the Sabbath, or to do evil?” Consider the question. Is it lawful to do good or is it lawful to do evil?

    As Jesus entered the synagogue that Sabbath day standing around him were the religious leaders and the deputies of the Sanhedrin. They were watching his every move – listening to his every word hoping only to find an opportunity to accuse him of breaking the law – that’s their own Jewish law with a small “l”, not God’s Law with a capital “L”. They were looking for grounds so that they could arrest him.

    Jesus was gaining a reputation as a troublesome teacher. The word was out that he should not be allowed to teach in the synagogues. Those doors were closing to him. That is why we have gospel stories of his teaching on the hill sides and from boats on the shorelines. And if he showed up, he was to be watched carefully for infractions of their law. It was actually a great show of courage for him to confront this danger and to go and teach inside a synagogue. But Jesus’ trust was in the Lord.

    Proverbs 3: verses 5-6 teach us: “Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways submit to him, and he will make your paths straight.”

    Being barred access to synagogues and teaching centers were now the circumstances Jesus was finding himself in. It was dangerous for him to enter them. The orthodox leaders of the religious community were aware of his controversial teachings and were at odds with him. He wasn’t keeping the law. Specifically, he was healing people on the Sabbath. That is why they were there. Would he break the law, yet again? If he did, then they could pounce. They were ready. The deputies of the Sanhedrin were the policing agents authorized to arrest and take him in for trial.

    That is the backdrop for what is happening in the Synagogue that day.

    This is the scene. There was a man standing in the congregation. According to writings called the Gospel of the Hebrews, he was a stone mason. We have limited fragments of these writings, and I referenced them here because I believe it helps us to understand what is happening. His hand and arm had been injured in an accident, and he was no longer able to work at his trade. I would suggest that he may have come to the synagogue that day hoping that this miracle working Rabbi might see him, have mercy on him and heal his injury. Make him whole again.

    Jesus calls him to the center of the congregation. Jesus turns to the synagogue leaders and the deputies of the Sanhedrin and asks them the question, “Is it lawful to do good on the Sabbath? Or evil?”

    Now I have asked you this same question already and I can hear you thinking out loud in your heads. Dah! Of course. It’s obvious, isn’t it? Of course we should do good on the Sabbath. Why would you ask such a question?

    Well, for the orthodox leaders of the synagogue and the deputies of the Sanhedrin, the answer to that question wasn’t so simple. You see they had a law – again that’s law with a small “l” – and they ardently followed that law. Their law was the foundation of their religious rituals. And that law told them that work on the Sabbath was forbidden. And healing, according to their law, was work. You see Jewish law was very detailed on this matter.

    According to Jewish law, medical attention on the Sabbath could only be given if a life was in danger. And healing someone on the Sabbath whose life was not threatened was forbidden work.

    Bible scholar William Barclay explains some of the details of the law regarding work on the Sabbath. For instance, you could help a woman in childbirth because her life might be in danger. But if a wall fell on someone, you could only clear enough of the wall to see if he was alive. If he was alive, you could help him but only to the point that he was stabilized. But if he was dead, the body had to be left for the next day to clear away. If the family wanted to remove the body, they could not. That is how detailed the law was in limiting what work you were allowed to do on the Sabbath and specifying what you were not allowed to do. This man who Jesus called to the center of the congregation was not in danger of losing his life. His arm was injured in an accident, but it was not life threatening. According to the law, a fracture could not be attended to. You could keep it from getting worse, but you could not make it better or heal it.

    So, for these believers in the orthodoxy of their law, this was not a simple question to answer. Everything they believed – that their religious law told them was that healing was work and work on the Sabbath was unlawful. It was a crime. When Jesus healed that was work and on the Sabbath that work was a crime. By their definition, Jesus was evil.

    But the question Jesus asked them was, “Is it lawful to do good on the Sabbath? Or to do evil?” He didn’t ask if it was lawful to heal which was all they were there to determine.  Their myopic focus on their law prevented them from hearing and seeing the Word of God.

    Jesus knew the Jewish law, but he also knew God’s Law and more importantly God’s Will and by that, I mean that Jesus understood the spirit of God’s Law. The spirit of God’s Law and God’s Will is that we be compassionate and to do the work of healing the brokenness of Creation. Jesus is telling them that God’s Will is that we do good on any and every day and that includes the Sabbath.

    Now, be alert to also hear the flip side of Jesus’ question. What Jesus is suggesting in his question is that if is unlawful to do good, does it become lawful to do evil. Because in Jesus’ mind leaving this man broken as he is – without showing love and compassion – is the same thing as doing evil. That is the conundrum Jesus is presenting to them. That is the conclusion that their Jewish law would point them to.

    Jesus’ question challenged the very foundation stones of Jewish law and its religious rituals. And to that challenge, the religious leaders had no answer.

    Jesus called this man to the center of the congregation hoping that the religious leaders would see him and have sympathy for his plight. But they did not. As shepherds of God’s fold, they were failing in their charge. Their rituals and law had become more important to them than the welfare of the people.

    So, they didn’t answer. They stood there silent. The gospel text tells us that Jesus became angry. The text tells us that “he was grieved at the obtrusiveness of their hearts.” Jesus became angry that when these shepherds of God’s fold were faced with the question of whether the law allowed them to do good or if it required them to do evil, the religious leaders stood fast and remained silent. They knew the people there would want the man to be healed. The man wanted to be healed. But their law didn’t allow it. So, they didn’t answer him.

    Jesus tells the man to stretch out his hand for all to see. And there before them all, his hand was restored.

    Now there is some fine print in this story probably more important than the miracle that Jesus performed. Come with me to dig deeper into its meaning. This incident was a head on clash of two very fundamental ideas of what religion is.

    Bible scholar William Barclay breaks it down this way. For the Pharisees, synagogue leaders, and the Sanhedrin, religion was ritual. For them the practice of their religion meant obeying rules and regulations. But their rules provided them with only rituals to follow in their practice of religion. And by obtrusively following their rules, they were closing their hearts from seeing the needs of God’s children. Those were their rules, and Jesus broke their rules, and then because Jesus broke the rules they were convinced he was evil. He was evil and he needed to be eliminated.

    That brings us to Jesus’ second question that were heard later in the text. “Is it lawful to save a life, or to kill it?”

    The final verse in our reading today tells us that the Pharisees immediately met with the Herodians [agents of Herod] to concoct a plot against Jesus. Their intention was to eliminate him – to kill him.

    Jesus’ second question struck at the very heart of their intentions. These religious leaders cared nothing about the Law – that’s God’s Law with a capital “L”. God’s Law stated quite clearly that “…thou shall not commit murder.” Yet that is exactly what they were plotting to do. They were going to break a core commandment of God’s Law in order that they could protect the integrity of their law – again that is law with a lower case “l”. Their rituals were more important to them than opening their hearts to the Word of God standing before them.

    Jesus, on the other hand has a different notion of what religious practices should be. Jesus’ idea of religion was service. For Jesus religion meant love of God AND love of neighbor. Being a servant that brings God’s love and compassion to our neighbors and to others was the most important thing he could teach them. Barclay writes, “Rituals were irrelevant when compared to love in action.” But their hearts were obtuse. They were hardened and could not see what it was that God’s Law required of them. They could not see how love would enter into the fray. To quote from Tina Turners’s lyrics, “What’s love got to do with it?”

    But that’s exactly what Jesus was all about – service borne out of love. This is his message. This is his good news. And they – the religious leaders – didn’t get it. They couldn’t see it. They couldn’t understand it. Their rituals and their law didn’t allow for it. When confronted with the needs of the people, they did not act. They remained silent.

    And that my friends is the lesson we have to grapple with today. When confronted with the needs of our neighbors and others around us, how do we act? Do we reflect God’s love and compassion?

    There is hunger in our communities. There is homelessness. There are people living in fear. Like Jesus’ disciples, they are hiding behind closed doors living in fear of the authorities. How do we respond to the cry of human need from our neighbors and others?

    We are here today to worship God. But if all this is only ritual and not a call to service, then what are we doing? We can go through the motions – sing hymns, say prayers, participate in Communion – and we can look like a good and priestly people but that’s not the same as being a servant people.

    That is what Jesus was trying to explain to the religious leaders in the synagogue that day and it is also what Jesus wants to say to us. Don’t let the practice of religion become ritual. Don’t let your minds and hearts fall into that trap of doing things and thinking that is what God desires of you. Jesus wants us to approach God with a heart yearning to serve God by sharing God’s love and compassion with everyone who needs to be comforted.

    Remember at the end times, the Son of Man will gather all the nations before him. “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world.For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat. I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink. I was a stranger, and you invited me in. I needed clothes and you clothed me. I was sick and you looked after me. I was in prison, and you came to visit me.”

    Then perhaps without thinking you might respond, “Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink?When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothed you?When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?”

    Then our Lord will reply, “Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these my brothers and sisters, you did it for me.”

    Jesus is telling us that sharing God’s love and compassion with our neighbors and with the others who are hungry, homeless, hurting and in need of healing is what Jesus calls his servant people to do.  

    My friends, during this Advent Season as you prepare for the day of the coming of the Christ child don’t let rituals decorate your path. Let your prayers be heartfelt and intentional. Sing your hymns with praiseful fervor. When you share Communion celebrate it knowing Jesus gave us this meal to do it in remembrance of him. But not only remembering his sacrifice on the Cross but also to remember his love and compassion for us.

    As Christmas Day [the coming of the Christ] approaches, prepare for it knowing that your redeemer came to walk and live among us. Know that he came to show us what a life of love, compassion and service looks like. The life of a servant people is what we are called to. Sharing God’s message of love and compassion and healing with your friends, your neighbors and the others you do not know is the service life we are called to. This is the Sabbath work that is good and that we are called to do.

    Charge to Congregation:

    My friends, my charge to you this week is this. As you journey through this Advent Season examine your rituals: the lighting of the Advent candles, the hymns you sing, the prayers you recite, and the your devotions each day and make sure you do them with a desire to be God’s servant people to the world infusing everything you do with God’s love and compassion for all God’s children.

  • Offered to the First Church of Hanover NJ

    Mel Prestamo, Elder, PCUSA

    As we prepare to look at this passage in John this morning, I think it is important to take a step back to understand what John is trying to accomplish in his Gospel. I am sure that you already know that John’s Gospel tells of the ministry of Jesus in a  very much different way from what are known as the Synoptic Gospels. One of my favorite ways of describing the differences between the four Gospels is to say that Matthew, Mark and Luke tells us what happened; John tells us why it happened.

    The feeding of the five thousand is a perfect example of this. In Matthew, he devotes 9 verses to the event. [Matt 14: 13-21] He simply tells us that it happened. John devotes 14 verses in chapter 6, verses 1-13. But he follows it up with 38 additional verses [22-59]. John provides additional context and meaning. After seventy or so years of mulling and thinking about the ministry of Jesus, John has a much deeper insight that he needs to share. And if we are going to benefit and grow in our own knowledge of Jesus then we have to follow John down his rich and rewarding rabbit hole.

    In the first three Gospels, the writers tell us the story of Jesus’ life and ministry and express in their stories the great degree of Jesus’ compassion for the people. Mark tells us the Jesus is moved with compassion for the leper. Mark also tells us that Jesus had sympathy for Jarious regarding the impending death of his daughter. When Jesus raises the son of the widow from death, Luke tells us that with tenderness, Jesus gave the widow her son. We are told that Jesus wept at learning of the death of his friend Lazarus. But in John, the telling of miracles has a different purpose. John calls them signs. And the purpose of these signs is not to display Jesus’ compassion but to point to and demonstrate the glory of the Christ and through the Christ the glory of God.

    At Cana, John says to us, “This was the first of his signs…to manifest his glory. [John 2:11] Of the raising of Lazarus, he says it was for the glory of God. [John 11:4] For John, it was not that there was no love or compassion in Jesus’ miracle acts but that every one of them pointed to the glory of God. And that God’s glory was manifesting itself into our human time and space. These miracles were signs that reveal to us a glimpse of who God is. And knowing this is vitally important if we are to understand what John is trying to tell us in his Gospel.

    Every one of the miracles that Jesus performs opens up a brief portal and gives us a glimpse of who God is. And this is the critically most important element of these signs. These glimpses of God are ONLY opened to us through the Christ.

    So, with that as our backdrop, let’s take a look at the miracle of the Feeding of the Five Thousand.

    Right at the top, I am going to suggest to you that there are three ways in which we can look at this miracle. The first would be very plainly that it was an outright miracle where a sparse and meager gift was turned into a bountiful meal. And certainly, the text stands on its own in substantiating that assertion.

    The second is that it might be a sacramental meal meaning it was something like our Christian Communion meals. Tiny parcels of the bread and sips of the wine are shared so that everyone can be fed. That is just an OK explanation for me. But the third is a much more compelling explanation for me.

    We are told in John’s telling that the “Passover Feast was near.” What does that tell us? Well, it means that thousands of the Jewish faithful were on the road on their way to Jerusalem for the celebration of the Passover. Remember it was a requirement of the law that anyone within a one day’s journey of Jerusalem must make the pilgrimage to the city. The Jewish historian Josephus recorded that a census taken by Roman governor Quirinius in 6 CE showed that at the time of Passover, the population of Jerusalem swelled to over two million people. This is to give you an idea of the numbers of people who were on the road to Jerusalem.

    What is important to understand here is that these people didn’t have fast food restaurants or convenience stores along the road where they could stop off to buy food for their journey. No, if they were making this trek, they would have to plan to bring enough food for themselves when they needed to stop and eat. And that’s what we see here when Andrew finds the young boy who had five loaves of barley bread and two fishes. The fish would have been something like sardines, a staple of travelers at the time.

    This meager meal is what the lad had brought along this journey for his own nourishment. It is reasonable to assume that many of the people in the crowd had done much the same thing. Perhaps, Andrew went through the crowd and was turned away by vast numbers of people who had something for themselves but were unwilling to share. It was only this young boy who was initially moved to come forward and share.

    Andrew brings this boy and his offerings to Jesus. Jesus instructs his disciples to tell the crowd to sit on the grass. Jesus begins by giving thanks to God with a traditional Jewish prayer of thanks. It might have been something like, “Blessed are thou, O Lord, our God, who causes to come forth bread from the earth.” Now one of two things happened at this point. We can either imagine the loaves and fish replicating themselves over and over piling up at Jesus’ feet so that suddenly there was enough to feed the five thousand. OR, we can envision Jesus solemnly praying to God and that prayer was as much an offering of praise as it was a plea that the hearts of those in the crowd who had food to eat come forward to share.

    Then we see a similar miracle. This one was not that Jesus miraculously created a bounty for all but that his prayer had silently moved the hearts of the thousands of people and that they came forward to share. Either way, Jesus has performed a miracle pointing to the glory of God where once again God is feeding God’s people.

    What we see is a meager gift that a believer brings to the Christ and how in Jesus’ hands with meager beginnings a miracle can happen. Now in this miracle, John sees a sign that points to the glory of God. For us, we can see how Jesus can take our own meager gifts and offerings and make bountiful things happen. On the surface our own individual small gift may seem inadequate but, in his hands, – in God’s hands, miracles can happen.

    It is to the glory of God that Jesus provides food to feed the people. Either way that you view how this miracle happened, it is John’s assertion that it pointed to the glory of God.

    But this miracle has another element. In it we can see a glimpse of the God that feeds God’s people. We see our God who nourishes and sustains us through God’s Word, the Christ.

    Where do we see that?

    OK. To answer that question we need to get into the nitty gritty of verses 22-59.

    In those following verses, we learn that Jesus now was in need of rest. So, he sneaks off to avoid the crowds. The people, however, chase after him and the find him again in Capernaum. They ask him, “When did you arrive and how?” Jesus’ response is to plainly say to them that they are searching for him not because of the signs that he had performed and that they and seen, but because he had fed them.

    Jesus says to them, “Do not search for food that perishes but for food which lasts and gives eternal life, that is the food that the Son of Man will give to you; for the Father, God, has set his seal upon him.”

    What is Jesus saying here? He reads the crowd plainly and he calls them out for their shortsightedness. He knows that many of them are nothing more than groupies following the latest pop star. And he says it directly. I will paraphrase here. “The only reason you are here is because I fed you. I have shown you signs from God, but you have not seen them. You have come for bread to eat but the bread you search for will [pass through you and] perish and leave you hungry again. I can give you so much more. The bread that I can give you will feed you forever and give you eternal life.”

    And what is their response? In verse 30 we read, “What signs are you going to perform that we may see and believe in you?”

    Are you kidding me? Are you blind? Well, yes. Many of them were blind. Jesus fed five thousand people days before and then they come asking “What signs will you perform?” He has raised people from death. He has cured the blind, the cripple, the leper. And you ask, what sign will you perform?

    They go on to speak of bread feeding miracles from Jewish history. Moses fed us manna in the desert. In other words, we have seen this parlor trick before. But Jesus counters by saying, Moses did not feed you the manna, God did. Further, “The bread of God is HE who comes down from heaven and gives life to this world.” John is here referring back to the opening verses of his Gospel story. “In the beginning was the Word…” Be clear. For John, Jesus was the Word that was with God in the beginning.

    Now it appears they are beginning to get the idea of what Jesus is saying. They respond, “Sir give us this bread.” However, that is to say, “Where is it? Where can we buy it.” Is it available at Walmart or Target?

    Jesus responds by saying to them, “I am the bread from heaven.”

    Now Jesus’ response creates a firestorm of questions in the crowd. Who does this guy think he is? Isn’t he the son of Joseph who we knew as a boy growing up in Nazareth? How can he say, “I come down from heaven?”

    But Jesus insists. “I am the bread of life. He who believes in me will have eternal life. Your fathers are manna in the desert and they died. This is the bread of life come down from heaven that you may eat of and not die…anyone that eats of this bread will live forever.”

    Let’s pause a moment and think about what Jesus means by “Bread”. It is not any earthly type of food – manna or otherwise. What Jesus is speaking of is the “WORD” of God. According to John, Jesus is the Word made flesh. “The Word was in the beginning. The Word was with God. The Word was God.” Jesus has come to reveal to us the life sustaining and lifegiving love of God through the Word. Hearing the “Word” of God spoken by Jesus is how we feed on the Bread that will give us eternal life.

    So, when we look back at the feeding of the five thousand, we need to realize how temporary that earthly food was. And Jesus points that out to them and us. They were fed yesterday and here they are hungry today looking to be fed again. He tells them, you need to be looking for something more substantial. You need to be looking for the bread that brings you closer to knowing who your God is; closer to having an intimate relationship with God; closer to knowing the name of God. And that bread is the Word. It is the Christ.

    Knowing the “NAME” of someone has a very specific meaning in ancient cultures. It meant to know a person on an intimate level. And that is what Jesus is bringing to us. It is an opportunity to know God on a close, personal, and intimate level. That is what Jesus is offering us when he offers himself as the “Bread come down from heaven.”

    And now, that is our task. We need not to get bogged down being concerned about what sustains us today. We need to focus on what will bring us closer to knowing the name of God – closer to knowing God on an intimate and personal level. And what will bring us closer to God? It is the Christ. It is the Word. Jesus is the bread that feeds us so that we can know God. Jesus feeds us the Word that is the bread that will give us eternal life in God.

    “Sir, give us this Bread.”

  • Luke: 21: 25-36

    Mel Prestamo, Elder PCUSA

    Reading these verses at the beginning of the Advent Season might be thought of as being odd given that during Advent we are usually looking towards Christmas Day and the stories of the Babe’s birth in Bethlehem. During the Advent Season, it might seem more appropriate to be reading the stories from the first chapter of Luke. We are expecting the narrations of the story of the Angel Gabriel’s visit to the young virgin girl Mary and her acceptance of her role in God’s plan for salvation and a recitation of the Magnificat. But rather than hearing the stories of the infant Babe and the little town of Bethlehem, this lectionary and the gospel writer Luke take us to the end of Jesus’ ministry here on earth. Today’s gospel reading has us focusing on not the first coming but the next coming of the Christ.

    Focusing on the next coming of the Christ was something that the early Christians did a lot of. The believed, indeed they expected, that the Christ was coming again, soon – right away. They were looking for it. They were hoping for it. The prayed for it. It was the obsession of every waking moment. During the time following the life, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus there was no celebration of his birth. There was only anticipation of the next coming of the Christ. Perhaps it is something that we don’t do enough of.

    I wonder how many of our congregation arose from their sleep this morning contemplating Christ’s next coming this day. Think about that. What would it mean in our lives if the Christ stopped time and broken into our realty and returned to take us home, today. Honestly now, is that the first thing that you thought of when you awoke this morning?

    Our lives have really gotten too busy. We’re planning the holiday season with check lists. We’re scheduling and preparing to host Christmas parties. Others of us are making travel plans to be with family. We’re arranging dates for visiting this relative or that one. We’ll be decorating our houses with lights and holly, and trees with ornaments. I’m sure that even after one of the largest menu packed days of our year, Thanksgiving, there are some well-prepared cooks who are already planning their Christmas dinners. And don’t forget to leave some time for gift shopping. Recently a family member announced they had already completed their Christmas shopping. That may not sound so bad expect they made the announcement back in October. We’re making the time for all these concerns and worries but have we stopped to hear the message that Jesus gave his followers in verse 34. “Be careful, or your hearts will be weighed down with carousing and drunkenness and the anxieties of life, and that day will close on you suddenly like a trap.”

    If we allow ourselves to be distracted by the anxieties of this life, we can lose the importance of the good news. That is that Christ will come again to take us home and we need to be ready.

    The early Christians were consumed by the thought of it. And why shouldn’t they be? Many of them had seen the Christ. He had walked among them. He had taught them on the hillsides and from the lake shores. He had fed them on the mountain. Some were privileged to see him after his resurrection. They broke bread with him. They touched his wounds. They received his Great commission and saw his ascension. They knew he was real. They were very much the other extreme from us. They were looking for signs in the sun and the moon every day. In the time of Luke’s writing, which was already after the destruction of the temple by the Romans, they must have believed they were all the more close to his coming. They must have been retelling the stories and Jesus’ words of how they needed to be prepared looking closely for the signs he had mentioned.

    Then there were those who planned for the coming of the Christ in much a different way. They did nothing. So real was it for them that he would be coming again soon to take them all to the Kingdom that they laid down and did nothing.

    Jesus had predicted the destruction of the Temple. It had happened.

    Jesus told them, they would be arrested. It happened. Peter and John and others had been arrested by the religious authorities. Some of them were executed by stoning.

    So, for the early Christians, they believed it was all coming together. They were waiting for his next coming. They were excited. They were vigilant.

    But after two thousand years, we have lost that anticipation. We come to worship each Sunday with no particular urgency. No. Wait. Let me rephrase that. We come here today with too many urgencies. Our minds are cluttered with arrangements that need to be made. Our hearts are distracted. We are weighed down with the worries of this life. We are not, “On guard.” Let’s face it, if Christ came today to take us home, we would cry out, “No. Wait. I’m not ready. You’ve come too soon. You were not expected.”

    We are like the bridesmaids at the wedding feast waiting for the bridegroom. They grew tired of waiting. They fell asleep and let the oil in their lamps run out. And while they ran out to buy more oil, the bridegroom came and they missed him.

    So much of what we do in our daily lives is a distraction. So much pulls us away. It bogs us down. It fills our minds with so many worries. In Mark, Jesus tells not to be concerned about the clothes we wear or the food we eat. Look at the flowers in the fields and the birds in the air. They are provided for by God. Are we not more important than these to God? As he cares for these so will he care for us. We shouldn’t allow this life to be so filled with worry that we become distracted from what is really important.

    But we are. We’re concerned about car payments, mortgages, the cost of living, our raises, our standard of living. We’ve grown complacent. The hour grows late and we’re letting our lamps run dry. We grow tired of being vigilant. Our eyes are heavy and we long for sleep. And in that moment of distraction, we miss him.

    We are far removed from the events of Jesus’ lifetime. We didn’t hear his words directly from him. We read the words in the gospels but we let them fall as just words instead of hearing them as the Word. We miss the exhortation.

     “Be on guard!”

    All of the things that Jesus warned us about are happening in our time. Christians are still being arrested and persecuted. Christians in China have to profess their faith behind closed doors. Priests and church leaders are imprisoned for the practice of their faith. In Africa, Christian workers are murdered because of the faith they profess and teach.

    If the persecutions are still going on today, if the waiting is still going on, shouldn’t our vigilance go on, as well? Shouldn’t we still be on guard?

    When you leave this place today will you be on guard? When you sit down for dinner this evening, will you still be on guard? This Advent Season as you prepare for the coming of Christmas and of the coming of the Babe, will you be on guard for the next coming of the Christ?

    Read verse 34 with me again. “Be on guard so that your hearts are not weighed down … with the worries of this life and that that day catch you unexpectedly, like a trap. For it will come upon all those who live upon the face of the earth. Be alert at all times, praying that you may have the strength to escape all those things that will take place and [pray that you will] stand before the Son of Man.”

    Amen.

  • Matthew 14: 1-14

    Mel Prestamo, Elder PCUSA

    There is a technique some people use in studying Bible text. They will look at a story repeated times. They will read it to hear if a specific verse or line might jump out at them. Then they will think upon it to allow God’s word to reveal something to them. Then at a later time, they will come back to it and allow another verse in the text to reveal itself to them and then they will ponder it. They will do this multiple times over and over again until they have heard God’s truth revealed to them in as many different ways as they can hear. The technique is called: Dwelling in the Word.

    When I read this text in preparation for this message, I was struck this time by the last verse. “…he had compassion for them.” Why? I asked myself. What was so special about this line, this time. Why did it catch my eye? So, I looked more closely at the story of Herod’s beheading of John the Baptist once again.

    John, Matthew tells us, had been arrested by Herod because of John’s constant harassment of Herod because He had taken his brother’s wife as his own. John was constantly telling the crowds that what Herod was doing was “unlawful.” Herod’s wife, Herodias, was embarrassed by the barrage of insults John hurled at her and Herod. So, Herod had John arrested and put in prison to silence him. Now Herod had to be careful. He was walking a tight line as John had grown very popular with the people.

    What is next described in verses six through 11 is the grotesque beheading of John. It is Herod’s birthday and as a gift Herodias’ daughter performs a sultry and suggestive dance for Herod. In appreciation, he promises her any gift she might desire. Shockingly, she requests John’s head on a platter to bring to her mother as a gift. The gospel writer tells us that Herod hesitantly at first but ultimately yields to the request and orders it to be done. So cheap was human life. The daughter presents John’s head to her mother as if to say, “Here, he will bother you no longer with his sanctimonious insults.”

    Verse 13 tells us that when Jesus heard of the news of John’s death and of how he had died, “…he withdrew.”

    Was Jesus horrified by the news of how John was executed? He was beheaded and his head served up on a platter. It was a gruesome was to do away with one’s political adversary – even for Herod. As a member of the same religious sect and family, was Jesus next?

    Was Jesus thinking that if Herod was bold enough to execute John who had a large following of disciples would Herod seek him out next? Did Jesus go into hiding as a means of self-preservation? This was not yet the time of Jesus’ path to the Cross. That was God’s plan. Did Jesus withdraw in order to uphold the integrity of God’s plan? Perhaps.

    But maybe instead, Jesus withdrew out of personal anguish. After all, John was his cousin. You will remember that Mary and John’s mother Elizabeth were related family members, possibly cousins. At the beginning of Luke’s gospel, the writer tells us that the Angel Gabriel goes to Mary and tells her that Elizabeth, your relative, was also pregnant. The word in Greek that Luke uses to describe the relationship is suggenēs. It can mean relative or kinswoman, possibly cousin.

    In Luke’s gospel, Mary visits Elizabeth while both are pregnant. Elizabeth’s yet unborn son leaps in her womb at the close proximity of the expected Messiah in Mary’s womb. Growing up as children, they no doubt had many opportunities for family interactions. Later in his life, John becomes the voice crying out in the wilderness announcing the coming of the Messiah telling the people to make straight the way of the Lord.

    Now, this terrible death of his cousin had struck Jesus in a very personal way. He needed to withdraw. He needed to be alone to experience his anguish. He needed to be alone with his Father, with his God. He needed to share with God his pain and his grief, the loss of his close family member.

    We don’t often, if ever, think of Jesus in this way. But he was human, too, and he experienced the same human emotions we do. Jesus went through all the experiences of life that we all do. He needed to go to God in prayer asking the same questions that we ask when confronted with such sudden violence and violent loss.

    Jesus may have gone to God to ask, Why? Why, John? Why so young? Why so violently? Why now? Why?

    He needed to take all of his pain and anguish to the Father. He needed to lay all this at God’s feet. It was under God’s wings that he would find refuge and comfort.

    So, Jesus withdrew from the crowds that had been following him. He set out on the lake to be alone. Alone in the solitude on the water, he took his grief to God.

    But what of the crowds? Many of them were followers of John. What of their grief and sorrow? They, too, were now experiencing loss.

    The news of John’s execution must have struck John’s disciples and the people of Palestine in much the same way public tragedy strikes us. If you are old enough, as I am, to remember the assassinations of John F Kennedy, Martin Luther King and Robert F Kennedy, you will recall how those events stopped a nation to bring us together of communal morning.

    We asked ourselves, why? And in our anguish, we sought out a leader who would console us in our pain and reassure us of God’s continued presence in a time of upheaval. That is what the crowds did.

    They were lost and wandering, weeping from the loss of John. What did they seek out? They did not turn to the King or to the chief priests. They sought out Jesus. And since they could not find him on YouTube or via a televised address with him sitting aside a comforting and warming fire in a hearth. They set out on foot traveling around Lake Galilee until they found him when he came ashore.

    Matthew tells us that when Jesus saw the crowds, “he was moved with compassion for them.” The verse jumped out at me.

    The people in their pain reached out for Jesus and he without hesitation reached out to console them. That is what stuck me in this text today. Jesus was grieving as they were grieving and he reached out with compassion to share their sorrows with them. He didn’t look down from on high as an omnipotent and all-powerful God. Instead, with compassion he offered them an opportunity to express that grief with their God and their God whose knows their grief bowed down to walk beside them and carry it for them through their darkest valleys. He weeps with us the same tears of anguish, knowing the same pain and loss, asking the same questions.

    Jesus does that for us every day, if we seek him out and go to him.

    Jesus knows our pain not only because he is an all-knowing God but because our God is one of us. He shares because he knows what pain feels like. He knows it because he experienced it. He knows our pain, and it moved with compassion.

    He has compassion not only because his love for us is a perfect love but because he knows the anguish the pain causes in human hearts and he aches to comfort it.

    How fortunate we are to have Jesus as Lord. This is a Lord who can save us from the grief of our brokenness. Thanks be to God. Amen.

  • Luke 15 / offered to the First Presbyterian Church of Succasunna, NJ

    Mel Prestamo, Elder, PCUSA

    Recently, I have been reading a book by Thomas Cahill [I apologize at this posting, I have lost the title of the book – but the credit for the thought belongs to Cahill]. In it he makes a comment about the Gospel writer Luke’s style of writing. He said that Luke wrote like a Greek stoic. By that he meant that Luke minimized extra emotion and descriptive adjectives in his text. For instance, in Luke’s telling of Jesus’ tirade in the temple we don’t hear about how Jesus loses his temper whipping the vendors and overturning their tables. Luke tells us only that Jesus clears the Temple. According to Cahill, Luke as a writer describes only the facts of the story.

    Now this was a surprise to me because as I read Luke’s account of Jesus’ parables of the Lost, I was struck by the enormous outpouring of compassion by the Father as Jesus and then the Gospel writer Luke describes him. Then I thought [now think this through with me], if Luke is downplaying the emotions and the descriptive adjectives in order to present an even keeled, stoic presentation of the ministry of Jesus and still this enormous outpouring of compassion comes through to us, then imagine how deep the compassion and love of the Father must have been when Jesus described it. I mean if Luke was trying to downplay the emotional side of the story, he couldn’t do it.

    Now, remember with me that this parable of the Prodigal Father [Luke 15: 11-32] is a part of a trilogy of parables concerning the ways that we can become lost.

    In verses 1 through 10, we have the stories of the lost sheep and the lost coin. In first parable, we hear of how we can become lost by wandering off. The with the lost coin, we learn that we can become lost through no fault of our own. Sometimes, we just fall through the cracks. But in both cases, Jesus tells us that we can be found – either through the diligent searching of the shepherd or the persistence of the woman who on her knees is determined to find the coin that had become lost.

    Finally in the last parable, we can become lost just by turning our backs on the Father and walking away. And still even as we are determined to remain lost, Jesus tells us that the Father is searching for us. Jesus describes how the Father remains vigilant keeping his eyes on the horizon waiting for a sign that the lost Son might be on his road back to the Father’s house.

    Jesus tells us that when the Father sees the wayward Son stumbling his way back home, he rushes out to meet him. And when the Father reaches his Son, he embraces him and welcomes him back. What comes next is forgiveness, restoration and celebration.

    And that is enough of a lesson for us on its own. But in today’s message, I would like to focus more on the parable of the Prodigal Father and the Lost Son.

    Jesus begins the parable by telling us that there was a man who had two sons. The Younger Son goes to the Father and asks that his portion of the estate be given to him. Now, you must make note that this son’s request is tantamount to wishing that the Father was dead.

    Biblical scholars who study the cultures of the people of Jesus’ time have commented that such a real-life request would have been greeted with a beating. It would have been the gravest of insults to the father and it would have been expected that a father in real-life would have disowned and expelled this upstart son from the household.

    However, the Father in Jesus’ story does not react in the expected manner. In the parable, the Father yields to the request and divides his estate between the two sons. You can image that the Pharisees and Temple Elders to whom Jesus is telling this story would be shaking their heads in disapproval and disbelief.

    We know the story. The younger son gathers up his newfound wealth and blows town. He leaves his Father’s house and travels to a foreign country in search of a different life from what he knew. He goes where he can experience the tantalizing temptations that this broken world presents us.

    We also know from the story that he squanders his wealth and is in short order broke and when a feminine hits the country, everyone is left to fend for themselves, and he is left without friends or resources. Ultimately, in order to survive, he takes employment sloping for some pigs. Image the depths to which this son has sunk that a Jew would resort to having to feed pigs.

    After a time of this deplorable lifestyle, he comes to his senses. He looks up from his depths to see that his only chance for survival is to return to God and his Father. So finally, he picks himself up and starts out on the road to return back to his Father’s house.

    We know what follows. The Father has been keeping a watchful eye on the road to know when his son has decided to return. When he sees him, he rushes out to meet him. The Father forgives. He restores the son to his former position of honor in his house and then calls for all to come and celebrate.

    Now that is a great part of the story for us to focus on because it gives us the reassurance that no matter how stupidly we behave, no matter how sinfully we act, and no matter where we may wander, God [the Father] will welcome us back into his embrace.

    That is the whole story arc of the Bible, isn’t it? We bolt away from God’s house [the Garden]. God searches for us, patiently waiting for us to find our way. He sends the Son to find us, to carry us home, to sweep out a room to find us lost in the dust and flooring and then waits for us to hear the voice of the Son calling us to return home. Now that’s a great story but that’s not all there is.

    I want to unravel some other things going on in Jesus’ parable of the Lost Son. First there is the younger son, and our natural inclination is to identify with him. Fine. But what about the older son? What is there of us in him?

    Here is a devoted and dedicated son who righteously submits respectfully to the Father. No matter what the request or expectation, the older son remains at home to faithfully do the Father’s work in the Father’s house. The older son represents those among us who show up to clear snow from the church walkways so that members can safely enter on bad weather days. He represents those of us who endure Session committee meetings so that the work of the church can go on. He represents those of us who faithfully pledge our dollars to fund the mission and ministry of the church. He represents those among us who without notoriety prepare the church newsletter for distribution. The older son completes the mundane tasks that keep the church going. He is the pillar of the community. He is the one who stays at home and toils in the vineyard to make sure that all the Father’s work gets done.

    In other words, he represents the faithful, good church people who everyday toil at church work.

    However, when Jesus describes the older son’s reaction to what the Father has done – forgiving, welcoming back and then celebrating the return of the younger son, we get a different picture.

    The older son tells the Father, “Lo, these many years I have served you. I have never disobeyed your commands.” How many of us can boast of such commitment to the Father to always have served him, to have never disobeyed. That’s a tall order. You would really have to step up your game to be able to use the words “always and never”. Now remember this is Jesus describing the older son. I don’t sense that Jesus is being sarcastic here. Jesus is genuinely describing how the Pharisees and Elders of the Temple see themselves and he isn’t saying that any of it is bad or wrong.

    But what I think Jesus is saying is that the Pharisees and Elders represented by the older son don’t understand the extent and scope of the father’s love, his dedication to the lost son and how important it is to the Father that he has found his way home, and the Father’s overwhelming desire to celebrate. They are not being bad or evil. It is only that they don’t understand.

    At a family picnic years ago, I had a discussion with someone who quite flatly said that she understood that Jesus was out to save everyone that he could. But the idea that someone who had wasted their life in sin, never giving a second thought to Jesus or his Word could be accept by Jesus on a death bed conversion and that they would have a place in heaven alongside her after she had spent her whole life in service to the Lord. [Reference the parable of the workers in the Vineyard]. That stuck in her craw. It just bothered her. She couldn’t get beyond the blindness of the older son.

    How many of us have allowed such a thought to slip into our minds? How many times have we allowed ourselves to think that a newcomer or visitor just isn’t our kind of church person? How many times have we thought in our minds very judgmentally that someone doesn’t live up to the same level of being a Christian that we do? How many times have we acted like the older son?

    The fact of the matter is that it happens all the time. It happened two thousand years ago. It happens today. That is why Jesus told the parable in the first place. That is why we study it today.

    So, you see, we can both be the younger son and the older son. We may even grow through our faith journey from being the younger son into being the older son. We can wither from being new and exuberant in our Christian life to being old and stodgy.

    It is at this point when we become aware that we are both the younger and the older sons, that Jesus gives a new vision of who need to become. At the point when as the older son we stand in judgment of the younger son that Jesus calls us to grow beyond being the older son to become more like the Father.

    Through all that goes on in this parable story, the Father remains devoted to both his sons. He patiently waits for the lost son to return home. And when he does, he grabs hold of him, forgives him, welcomes him into his house dressing him in the raiment that is accorded the Father’s son.

    However, he also goes lovingly to the older son and acknowledges his dedication and service. Verse 31 “…son, you are always with me and all that is mine is yours.” He patiently explains why it is important that the entire family [congregation] celebrate with him upon the lost son’s return. The Father goes out to the lost older son to invite him into the celebration. There is no harsh judgment in the father’s words.

    We do not know what the older son finally does. Does he go in or stay out – separating himself from the Father’s joyous celebration? We don’t know the answer to that question. Jesus doesn’t answer it for us. In truth, we still have to write the ending to that story. It has been left blank for us to complete.

    But the final theme for us to focus on here is the love of the Father. The next step for us to take in writing the ending to this story is to grow from being the older son into becoming more like the Father. Jesus calls us to be more loving, to be more devoted, to risk our lives and to give all that we have trusting that The Father’s love will be poured out on us, and that love will find its way home. Jesus calls us to be more forgiving and to enter into the Father’s house in celebration with the Father. Jesus calls us to be more like the Father.

    Thanks be to God our loving Parent.

  • Offered by Mel Prestamo, Elder PCUSA

    The year 2020 will no doubt be recorded as one of the most trying, exasperating and difficult tests of survival in our country’s history. But more than that, it is as equally trying a test for American Christians.

    The cornerstone of our country’s foundation – the one our nation was built upon –  that is the notion of “liberty and justice for all”, is being shaken and tested; no less is our Christian faith and its Cornerstone – Love the Lord your God with your whole heart, your whole soul, and your whole mind, and your neighbor as yourself – these are equally under stress.

    We are a nation divided. We are Red States. We are Blue States. We are us. They are them. We are Second Amendment advocates, or we are thieves in the night trying to steal away guaranteed rights. We are White churches. We are Black churches. We are strong loving Americans protecting our neighbors by wearing masks; and, we are a people asserting our personal liberties not to wear them and not to care. Some Christian religious leaders have taken sides – applauding Bible thumping stunts  – while other pastors are tear-gassed and pushed away from their own houses of worship. We have been divided into a country struggling to return to greatness and a country hoping to still become that great Light shining on the hilltop.

    Quoting the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, I ask you the question, “Where Do We Go From Here?”

    I apologize for the political over tones of the beginning of this message; however, I must confess to you that I am consumed by the events that have rocked and are rocking our nation as I sit to compose this message to you. So, I beg your forgiveness if my words are off putting. And to answer Rev. King’s question, I have chosen to turn to Scripture.

    In Matthew 22, an expert in the Law asked of Jesus the question, “What commandment in the Law is the greatest?”, Jesus replied to him, “ You must love the Lord your God with your whole heart, and your whole soul, and your whole mind. This is the great and chief commandment; and the second is like it, “You must love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments the whole Law and the prophets depend.”

    For the first half of his answer Jesus is quoting from Deuteronomy 6:5 It is the basic and essential creed of Judaism. Theologian William Barclay says of it, “It means that to God we must give total love, a love which dominates our emotions, a love which directs our thoughts, and a love which is the dynamic of our actions.” And I would add, when we rise in the morning, our Love of God should be the single driving force that enriches and motivates our lives.

    The second commandment that Jesus refers to is from Leviticus 19:18. “You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against your countrymen. Love your fellow as yourself.” I would suggest to you that our love of God MUST be displayed and evidenced as a love of and for others.

    How does this commandment guide and influence us as Christians in America? We might want to say, it is how we meet and treat the people around us – with Love. We might go as far to say, it is the basis in Law upon which we have built this nation. It is what the notion of justice for all is built upon. If I love my God, then I love my neighbor and I treat my neighbor fairly and equally and with respect.

    But, yet I wonder.

    I am a Face Book user and I follow a number of my church friends. A couple of them have been reposting a statement and perhaps you’ve seen it. It reads:

    “I don’t care if you’re Black, White, Straight, Bisexual, gay, lesbian, short, tall, fat, skinny, rich or poor. If you’re nice to me, I’ll be nice to you. Simple as that!

    Now this sounds “simple” enough. It sounds “nice” enough. But do you see, do you understand -how perversive it is to the teachings of the Jesus? He taught us that if you love your God then love your neighbor – first. Not after your neighbor is nice to you. Your neighbor does not have to prove their worthiness to you, first. We are called to love our neighbor period. I scream at my Christian friends, Stop posting this! This is NOT how we Christians are supposed to treat people.

    But it begs the question, if that is how we approach people – If you are nice to me – are we being Christian? Jesus taught his disciples that any parent can be loving to his child [if your child asked for a fish, would you give him a snake?] NO! Of course not. Any parent is capable of loving their own child. But it is not enough. We, Christians, have to go further. We have to do more.

    What is happening in America is an indication that we need to go further. We need to look within ourselves and be critical about the way we treat our fellows.

    America is a great and wonderful country; but not for all.

    The Federal Reserve has said that the top 1% of Americans control 35% of the nation’s wealth. That means $34 trillion dollars in wealth is in the hands of only 3 million people. The top 20% of households control more wealth than the entire middle class. On average, Black families possess only 9% of the wealth of White families. At the median, Black families have an average wealth of $13,500 in wealth [total wealth] versus the average wealth for White families 10x greater – that is $142,000.

    How has that happened?

    Our own history tells the story. In the 1800’s our government enacted laws to create a transfer of wealth from the government to the citizens via the Land Rushes. What does that mean? It means that White Americans were given the opportunity to create wealth through the acquisition of land at a time when Black Americans were still in Slavery. Black Americans were not given the opportunity to gain wealth through the acquisition of property until the 1960’s through the Equal Right Act; however, that right is curtailed through the bank lending tactic of Redlining Black neighborhoods – a practice that is still going on today.

    What does all this mean within the scope of our message today? It means when people of color say to us that racism in America is “systemic” [that is built into the structures of our banking, economic, educational and the legal systems], they are speaking a truth to us.

    Now, that is not to say that we are racists – you and I. I do not believe that. But what it reveals is that privilege in America is decidedly biased toward Whites. Regardless of how hard I have worked to gain the wealth that I possess, I have had the advantage of a White bias. Now believe me I have worked hard for what I possess in wealth. I am a commission salesman and I have not worked a day in the last forty years when I was paid a base salary. Every dollar that I have earned has been hard earned. There were days of no sales that I came home with nothing – no sales, no pay. But still, I enjoyed the privilege of the bias that benefits me as a White. I know there were doors on sales calls that were opened to me because I look the way I do  – that would have been shut to people of color. As hard as I have worked, I know that it is true.

    Again, what does that mean for us as Christians? How do we step out against the tide of systemic injustice “to love our fellow”? There may be one, but I think I am safe in guessing that no one listening to me today controls the banking and economic system in America; nor is there one that can change the legal & educational systems. So, without that power and authority to make change, what are we American Christians to do?

    Again, let’s turn to Scripture.

    In John 2:14-16 we can gain an example from Jesus. “14In the temple courts he found people selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. 15So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple courts, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. 16To those who sold doves he said, “Get these out of here! Stop turning my Father’s house into a market!”

    Here we see an example of our Lord that is total out of character to the extreme. It is one that befuddles us. It is hard to balance his actions in the Temple with his teachings; especially those in what we call the Beatitudes. In Matthew 5:5 Jesus teaches us, “Blessed are the “meek”, for they shall inherit the earth.” Or with the Jesus who teaches us in Matthew 5: 39, “I tell you not to resist evil; but if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other to him also.”

    How are we, “meek, turn the other cheek” Christians, supposed to step out against the systemic injustice that imperils and causes pain to our “fellow” who we are commanded to love as an expression of our love of God?

    Well the first step might be to better understand what Jesus meant by blessing the meek. What does it mean to be meek? In our lexicon today, meek has a meaning of being spineless and submissive. But it was not so in the Greek language in which this text was written. In the Greek language, meekness was a virtue that exhibited a balance between excessive anger and excessive angerlessness. It was the balance between knowing when to be angry and when not to be. As a general rule for Christians, it is never right to be angry for ourselves but it often right to be angry about injuries done to other people. William Barclay frames it this way, “Selfish anger is always a sin. Selfless anger can be one of the great moral dynamics of the world.”

    That is the anger that Jesus exhibited in the Temple. It was not a rage to avenge an insult to himself. It was a rage to avenge an insult against his Father and his Father’s house. He overturned the tables in order to overturn the abomination that had been sanctioned by the religious authorities who had used the Law to oppress the poorer, disenfranchised “fellows” that Jesus had come to love.

    In Matthew 5:9, Jesus tells us, “Blessed are the peace-makers, for they shall be called sons of God.”

    How do we peacemakers fit in? Do we wave a white flag as call for a truce? Is it enough to simply call for a violence or injustice to stop?

    Here we need to understand what the word “Peace” means in this text as Jesus is using it. The word in Hebrew is “Shalom”. Shalom is never simply the absence of trouble. In Hebrew, peace always means everything which provides for a person’s highest good. In the Bible, peace is not only a freedom from trouble but the enjoyment of all that is good.

    So, what does that mean? It means peace-making is not simply peace-loving. We are not making peace if we are avoiding reality and piling up more trouble for the future for the sake of a quiet today. This Bible blessing does not come to those who avoid thorny issues; but to those who actively face them and make peace – that is a peace that creates the greater good for our “fellows”. Shalom-making is God’s active role in the cosmos; bringing it together into a oneness with God. We can’t do that with patch work peace – peace for some but not all – a peace that leaves our “fellow” in distress. Shalom calls us to act to bring about a oneness of all God’s creation.

    In Matthew 5:39, Jesus tells us to turn the other cheek. But how does he do it? If you can picture in your mind’s eye how someone would slap your face to insult you. It was traditionally done [in Rome] with the right back hand against the right cheek. Turning the other cheek [the left] to another back-handed slap makes another strike impossible. You can’t slap the left cheek with the back-handed right. So, while Jesus is telling us not to meet violence with violence, he was also telling us how to stand against unjust authority.

    So perhaps, this is how Jesus tells us to step out against the injustices that are systemic within our nation. By knowing when it is right to be angry and by making a Shalom that brings everything good thing to everyone. That in being a properly balanced meek Christian, we can be angry against the wrongs done to our fellow and move to make peace – true peace – not just the absence of protests and killings – but true Shalom.

    A popular protest phrase of the day is, “Silence is Violence.” When Christians misunderstand how it means that they are called to be meek and to be peace-makers and they don’t take action while witnessing the violence against their fellow – whom we are called to love – then they don’t understand Jesus. Theirs’ is a silence which begets violence.

    Remember Jesus’ story of the fellow who was beaten by thieves and left on the side of the road to die. Two believers passed him by and refused to help him because of what the Law demanded of them. The Law demanded that they be clean and undefiled because they were leaders in the Temple. Then came one who without question or qualification went to the injured man got down on his knees to lift him up and care for him. He didn’t ask the man “Have you been nice to me?” He simply saw need and went to help. With meekness, he stepped into a dangerous situation and worked to make peace.

    Jesus has shown us how to act when our fellow, our neighbor, is being injured and abused. He has shown us that as his followers and as lovers of God, we need to go out and be meek. We need to actively and proactively engage the issues of the day when we see our fellows being treated unfairly seeking the justice that God requires of us. We need to be peacemakers.

  • Matthew 22: 1-14

    Offered to the First Presbyterian Church of Succasunna, NJ, 2012

    Mel Prestamo, Elder, PCUSA

    “The kingdom of God is like this..” This is the second time I have gotten an opportunity to speak about this passage from Matthew. The first time must have been four years ago, the last time that it came up in the lectionary. It is one of what are called Kingdom Parables. And when we hear Jesus say, “The kingdom of heaven is like this”, we should really perk up and listen closely because Jesus is alerting us that this is really important.

    The problem is that this text really gets ugly. The actions of the king when he reacts to what the invited guests have done are difficult to imagine being compared to or giving us insight to how our loving God would treat us. He sends an army to destroy their villages and then again at the end when he casts out the one guest that he dragged in from the highway to the wedding for not dressing appropriately. He had him bound and thrown into the dark where people will cry and grit their teeth in pain. This describes a rather mean spirited and not so benevolent or loving God. It is not quite what we expect Jesus to be teaching us about our God.

    This is not an easy teaching for us to accept about the kingdom of heaven and our God.

    The problem is that this recorded in Matthew’s Gospel probably was not one whole teaching of Jesus as it is presented by Matthew. In fact there are two parables here that were typical teaching stores of the rabbis of Jesus’ time.

    The first is the story of the king, the wedding, the invitation, and the refusal. The second at the end is the story of the guest who arrives ill-clad for the wedding. And then sandwiched in between is the story of the vengeful and punishing actions of the king when he send the army to destroy the people’s cities and kill the murderers themselves. This is a part of the gospel story that scholars suggest might be added material by Matthew. But we come back to that.

    Let’s look at the first part of the parable. The portion when the king sends out his save-the-date announcement. So what is Jesus telling us the kingdom of heaven is like?

    Well first, we are told that there is a king that gave a wedding banquet for his son. The king sent some of his servants to tell the “invited guests” to come to the banquet. But they refused. Later the king sent the servants to tell the “invited guests” that the banquet was prepared and that they should come NOW. “My prized cattle and calves have all been prepared. Everything is ready. Come to the banquet.”

    But they did not come. Some left for their farms or businesses. Others grabbed the servants and treated them badly, beat them, and killed them. This seems to have been a well know rabbinical teaching of the time. It was not unusual for rabbis and prophets to be telling Israel that God has invited them to a great feast and that they are refusing to partake. Jesus wasn’t the first prophet to tell Israel they were missing out on the banquet. But he does put his own twist at the end.

    What do the people do when they receive the announcement? They go to work their farms. They go to their businesses. We think that 21st century people and their crazy work and recreation schedules are a new thing. But look here. 2000 years ago they were doing the same thing. They were working their farms or going to their business. Why? Probably, just to survive. People are working multiple jobs today just to survive and it is really no different than it was in Jesus’ time. We all look at our responsibilities and the needs of the people who rely on us for sustenance and we make what appear to be very reasonable decisions about our relationship with God. It begins with just the one time; then it becomes a couple of missed worship services. Then after a time, we miss more than we participate in. And it may not be because we are sluggards. But it is because we have arranged our priorities to place our relationship with God second.

    Now people will argue to justify their actions that they have to survive and make a living. And they do. They have made a decision not to rely on God’s choices for their lives. They are making choices that in effect say “I will handle this on my own. I will work harder. I will rely on myself.” The sad, sad truth of people who ignore the invitation and refuse to go the banquet is that they will miss such a wonderful, joyous celebration with God. You see, the king has prepared all the best for us and invited us to the banquet. How sad it would be if we refused to go and missed all of the King’s wonderful gifts.

    The next portion of the text is about the king’s reactions to how his invitation is refused and how his servants are treated. Indeed they are beaten and killed.  Beaten and killed as was the Christ on Calvary. In this text, the king sends an army to destroy the cities and kill the murderers. If this was part of Jesus’ teaching, it would place us all in a very precarious circumstance. How many times have we refused the invitation? Do we think that our God would send an army after us to destroy our homes and kill us? This would be a very difficult teaching to reconcile with the God of love that Jesus tells us the Father is all about.

    I suggested to you that this may be some added text by writer of Matthew. Scholars point out that Matthew was writing his gospel about 80 CE. There was a very significant event in the history of Israel that occurred about 70 CE. That was the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple by the Romans. The Romans had grown weary of the pesky Jewish uprisings and their murdering of Roman soldiers so in 70 CE they sent an army and destroyed the city of Jerusalem and executed the people responsible for the uprisings. So maybe, about 10 years later, Matthew writes his gospel and with a tinge of vengeance, he sticks it a little bit to the Jewish authorities who had murdered the servant and messenger from God whom he had loved and dedicated his life to. Matthew might be forgiven if he had succumbed to the temptation to embellish the story with a little zing. He was only human.

    So if we can take this portion of the text and pull it away from the other two parables, we now will have a positive teaching about the kingdom of heaven and one foreboding warning. So now let’s look at the second parable.

    In this parable, the king sends his servants out to drag anyone that they can find on the highways and bring them to the wedding. Now to be clear, people that are out on the street are not your wholesome citizens. The servants drag in the good and the bad alike. They filled the banquet room. Now let’s consider this. These are people who by no stretch of their imagining would ever dream that they would be invited to the king’s wedding celebration. They are not the “Invited Guests”. They are not the chosen ones. They are outsiders. They are not considered clean by Jewish law. They have no business being at the king’s banquet. Yet, there they are.

    This parable teaches us that the “Invited Guests” who had refused the king’s invitation will miss out on the joyous celebration and that the invitation will now pass to those who had previously been considered as unworthy. That’s you and me.

    So what happens when the king comes down to meet the guests? He encountered one who is ill-clad. In other words, he was given proper wedding clothes to wear but he has refused. He has come to the banquet but his motives are impure. He shows up wearing the clothes of a sinner. He has been given a great gift but he has shown up with a closed heart. He remains resolute in his sin, unrepentant. In other words, you can’t fool God. God can see through you if you come with dishonest intent with a heart not open to God but closed and unwilling to truly participate in God’s joyous celebration. What does the King do? He throws the bum out. That is Jesus’ warning to us. God will go out and find you and bring you in. But if you heart is not reconciled to God; if you hold back; you will be found out and thrown out into the darkness. What is the darkness? It is the absence of the Light. It is being without God.

    So the question becomes, which of the three examples of people are we, are you? Well, since you are here, I think that we can rule out the first group that refuses to come to the wedding. But let me admonish you not to allow yourself to fall into the trap of thinking some outside activity is more important than your relationship to your God. We would like to think that we are in the group of outsiders who are dragged to the wedding when we had no expectation of being invited. We can be. But there is a caveat.

    Years ago, I did a children’s sermon. I invited the children up to the front of the chancel area and had them sit in the front pew. Then I went out into the hallway to get my props. I have five or so empty suitcases. I picked them all up and carried them in at one time. I came back into the sanctuary carrying all of the bags and staggered around for a while. I stumbled on the stairs and then dropped the cases all over the floor. Then I turned to the children and the congregation and said, “Sometimes, Christians carry a lot of baggage.” It got a laugh. But it also made the point that sometimes, we come to God with a lot of old baggage that we don’t want to let go of. That’s what this third guy is doing. He is dressed in his old clothes. He comes to God, but not on God’s terms. He comes on his own terms. He knows that God is where the salvation is. But he doesn’t want to listen to God’s voice and come to God in a way to that leaves behind all his old stuff, his old baggage. He comes to God on his own terms and God sees it immediately and dismisses him. He casts him out.

    This is the group that we can be perilously close to being a part of. You see God invites us in and we have responded. God welcomes us. But have we come to God on God’s terms, dressed in new clothes for the wedding of the Son.

  • Matthew 22: 1-14

    Offered to the First Presbyterian Church of Succasunna, NJ, 2008

    Mel Prestamo, Elder, PCUSA

    Well, we’ve got a lot on our plate here. We have a Kingdom Parable. It is one in which Jesus begins by saying, “The kingdom of God is like…” A couple of weeks ago, Pastor gave us some insight into kingdom parables. He told us that when Jesus starts teaching with the phrase “…the kingdom of God is like…” that we must carefully consider the whole of the lesson and not rush to extract out elements like how many rooms are there in my Father’s house or where will I be seated … on your right or left hand? You don’t want to be too specific or narrow in your interpretation.

    More than that, we have a parable that is in a word – UNCOMFORTABLE – to listen to. Here we see a king angered concerning the treatment of his servants, raising an army, burning homes and destroying cities and killing those who had offended him. It is a very Old Testament, Sodom & Gomorrah like story. Who is this king? Who is this guy and what have you done with my God of love and mercy?

    I read one commentary resource that said that most preachers will opt out of using this version of the parable and choose to use a similar text in Luke’s Gospel. That one is a more listener-friendly version with no armies, destruction of homes or wars.

    Well, let’s deal with this difficult question right away. Where is Jesus going with this parable? Why is he using all this war like military imagery? Well, the answer may be that Jesus may not have taught this story as one continuous parable. What we have here may actually be two parables. We have one parable in verses 1-6 & 8-10 and a second one in verses 11-14.

    How do we know that? Well, when the two are separated, they are very similar to two very well know rabbinical stories of Jesus time. What Jesus does is to change them a bit to suit his own purposes.

    The first story is completely in accordance with Jewish custom at the time. When there was a wedding, invitations went out to the invited guests similar to our “Save-The Date” invitations. They were an advanced notification. Except, they didn’t specify the date or the time. All they really said was that you are invited. As an invited guest, you were expected to prepare for the wedding feast and then wait. When everything was finally prepared by the host, then a final summons would go out, and you were expected to be ready and to show up at the feast. So then as this story goes, the original invitation to this wedding had long since gone out and the invited guests knew well in advance that they were invited.

    So, what happens in our story when all is prepared, and the final summons goes out? The invited guests make excuses. One had to go to manage his estate. Another went to oversee his business. They make a choice to forgo the “joy” of the wedding feast. Their reasons seemed to them [and perhaps to many of us] to be very earnest and worthwhile reasons. But still their refusal is an insult to the host.

    So, what does the king do? He sends his servants out to bring in people from the highways – passers by [if you will] – people who had no expectation whatsoever of receiving an invitation. These are people who perhaps know nothing of this wedding feast or even of who this king is. This is an important distinction. The invited guests expected an invitation. The passers-by had no expectation of receiving an invitation from the king.

    But understand this, one way or another, the king will fill the wedding hall with guests and the celebration – this joyous celebration will go on.

    Let’s stop for a moment and assess what we have thus far. Now this is the thing, it would be simplistic and shallow of us if we just skimmed the surface meanings of this parable and said, the king represents God, the son at the wedding feast represents the Son, the invited guests who refuse to go to the feast represent the Jews and the people who are brought in from the outside into the wedding feast are – well that would be us – the good Christian faithful.

    Yeah, but that would be too easy, and you wouldn’t need me up here to tell you something that obvious.

    When Pastor and I discussed this parable, one of the things that he mentioned was that in Kingdom Parables whenever you think Jews draw an arrow directly to Christians and when ever you think Israel draw another arrow directly to the Church. That is because these parables should be just as convicting of us listening today as they may have been for the Scribes and Pharisees who were listening the first time Jesus spoke these stories. Stop for a moment and consider what we are doing here in this sanctuary. Haven’t we been invited to a great feast in this worship of God’s holy name? Take a look around. Why aren’t the seats filled? Why are so many of them empty? How many of our friends – how many of this congregation are making excuses as to why they can’t be here?

    Now here is something to think about. In the parable, the invited guests who refuse the invitation have very fair and reasonable excuses for not going into the wedding feast. None of them was going off to do anything immoral or wrong. One needed to tend to his business. Don’t many of us work on the Sabbath? Another had business at his estate. Isn’t it reasonable if someone has an important issue to resolve and that they go to see to it? Then if we look at the parallel story in Luke, we find one person had to take delivery of a team of oxen and another had just recently gotten married himself and felt that he had a better offer.

    These are all fair and reasonable excuses. But look how seductively the idolatry of business and daily life has replaced worship of God. Picture this if you will in terms of the first commandment, “Thou shall have no other gods before me. And then the second, You shall not make for yourselves a graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, … you shall not bow down to serve them;” What have these guests done that is so terrible. They have replaced the opportunity to be in joyous celebration with the king for the mundane responsibilities of every day life. 

    What Jesus is trying to explain to us is that whether you are prepared to answer the invitation or not the feast will go on – with or without you. The king will still celebrate his joy with those who answer the call. Those who refuse – be they Jew or Christian will be left standing at the outside of the door watching the joyful feast within but not participating. The tragedy of life is that so often second bests shut out the things which are supreme. Missing the feast is not so much a punishment as it is a tragedy of lost joy.

    Does that make sense? Christian theologian William Barclay commented, “If we refuse the invitation of the Christ, some day our greatest pain will lie not in the things we suffer, but in the realization of the precious things we have missed.” [Wm Barclay]

    Now if you have been attentive, you are aware that I have skipped over verse 7. It has to do with the king raising an army and destroying the people who refused the invitation and then murdered the king’s servants. The reason for that is because Jesus probably didn’t teach this as part of his parables. Modern scholars look at the text and point out that a Jewish rabbi probably wouldn’t have gone there. They point out that the writer of Matthew was recording these stories somewhere between 80-90 CE. If you look at the history, there is a cataclysmic event that took place in Palestine around 70 CE. It was the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem by the Roman army. What we may have here may be an editorial comment by the author sticking it to the Jews saying, “You see. If you had followed Jesus when you had the chance, none of that would have happened.” It would have been out of character to the stories for Jesus to have said that. So, there is at least the possibility that verse 7 might have been added text.

    Now let’s consider the second parable in verses 11-14. This is the part of the story where the king spots a guest who is improperly dressed without wedding attire. The king goes to him and challenges the guest and asks why he is not in wedding clothes. The guest has no good response. So, the king has him bound up and thrown into the darkness where Jesus says, “…there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. For many are called and few are chosen.”

    Now on the heals of the first parable and the inserted text about the king destroying the insulting guests, you have to be taken aback. You might scratch your head and ask, “Jesus, what are you saying here? You go out and drag people in from off the highways and then because they are not dressed rightly you throw them into a pit of darkness. What gives?

    But when we break apart the two stories, we find a separate parable again based on another rabbinical story of the day. But Jesus changes it a bit for his own purposes by tacking on to the first parable.

    What is Jesus saying here? He is still talking about the guests who are called from the highway. These people have no expectation of being invited to the king’s feast or to put it more directly – of being included in the promise of salvation from the Jewish God. This one god – no idols allowed, Sabbath is holy – Shalom God is just some anomaly that those annoying Jews invented. It has nothing to do with us Gentiles as they call us. But yet this Jesus, their Messiah, is specifically calling and inviting us in.

    And that is true. Jesus is restating that the promise of salvation is universal and open to all. All are invited into the Feast. But there is one proviso. You can’t live a life of sin and show up at the king’s feast still dressed in the clothes of a sinner. You can only enter in if you have let go of and shed your sinfulness and have re-clothed yourself in the proper wedding garments and are prepared to sit with the king at the wedding feast.

    You may have been called but if you stubbornly come clothed as a sinner, the king will scrutinize you. The king will see you for what you are and have you cast out into the darkness. We are all called but we have to make the choice to be among the few are chosen.